Client stories

Evidence from packages we have reviewed

Comments reference specific schedules, filing constraints, and corrections — not generic praise.

“Their findings memo caught a receivable schedule that still used February closing balances while the cover sheet showed March. We fixed it before the bank appointment.”

— Mei-Ling Chen, manufacturing finance lead, Zhubei · Full Application Financial Audit

“The completeness pass was slower than we hoped because our annex names were messy, but the punch list made the grant clerk’s screening uneventful.”

— Daniel Wu, cooperative society treasurer · Document Completeness Pass

“Schedule verification showed our inventory roll-forward omitted a consignment line. Mild frustration that we had signed off internally, yet better we found it than the credit officer.”

— Rina Sato, controller for a regional distributor · Supporting Schedule Verification

“After we closed half the findings, the readiness check confirmed two collateral notes were still outdated. That second pass saved us from a messy resubmission.”

— Kevin Huang, family business advisor · Revision Readiness Check

Case note: Mid-market credit facility pack

A Hsinchu manufacturer asked for a full financial audit of applications five weeks before a revolving facility renewal. The pack included management accounts, a thirteen-week cash forecast, and collateral schedules across two plants.

Our review flagged three material items: a cash flow that excluded VAT timing, a mortgage annex referencing a discharged lien, and an inconsistent headcount figure between the narrative and payroll extract. The team corrected the file in nine days; the clarification call assigned owners for each severity tag.

Outcome: the bank’s first-round questions stayed limited to forward-looking covenants rather than basic tie-outs. Engagement fee fell in the mid range of our full-audit guidance after a modest rush adder.

Case note: Municipal innovation subsidy filing

A small design studio needed a completeness pass against a newly issued form set. Prior-year folders still used old annex letters. We remapped the index, marked six missing signature pages, and noted one optional revenue detail that staff had over-prepared.

The studio filed on time. Administrative screening returned no document requests. Substantive scoring remained outside our scope, as agreed at intake.

Discuss a similar package